Conductor Selection Considerations for Overhead Transmission Lines

---

Introduction

In high-voltage transmission line engineering, the selection of conductors plays a crucial role in ensuring system efficiency, reliability, and long-term cost-effectiveness. Conductors are the lifeline of a power transmission system, carrying electrical energy across vast distances under varying mechanical, thermal, and environmental conditions. Choosing the wrong conductor type or size can lead to increased energy losses, reduced reliability, and costly operational challenges.

This article explores the conductor selection considerations outlined in international practices and standards (with reference to TES-P-122.03), breaking them into four major areas: main considerations, thermal ampacity, bundled conductors, and corona performance. Each factor is discussed from both a technical and practical perspective, providing engineers and planners with clear insights for effective transmission line design.

---

1. Main Considerations in Conductor Selection

The selection of conductor size and type at any transmission voltage level must balance technical performance and economic feasibility. Engineers must consider not only the current carrying capacity but also reliability, future expansion, and operational sustainability.

1.1 Power Transfer Capability

The foremost criterion is ensuring that the conductor can transfer the required amount of power safely and reliably. This involves analyzing system load growth, contingency planning, and maximum power transfer limits as defined by system operators.

1.2 Economic Considerations

The cross-sectional area of the conductor has a direct impact on both capital cost and capitalized cost of losses:

• A larger cross-sectional area reduces resistance, leading to lower line losses, but comes with higher upfront cost.
• A smaller cross-sectional area reduces initial investment but increases I²R losses over the conductor’s lifetime.

Hence, a balance must be struck using life-cycle cost analysis.

1.3 Standardization

To optimize spares management and reduce maintenance complexity, utilities often standardize conductor sizes across networks. Using common conductors simplifies procurement, reduces inventory requirements, and ensures faster replacement during outages.

1.4 Thermal and Mechanical Suitability

The conductor must withstand thermal loading without exceeding permissible sag limits. Mechanical strength must also meet regional loading conditions (wind, temperature, and terrain).

1.5 Corona and Radio Interference

At high voltages, corona discharge becomes a limiting factor. The selected conductor diameter or bundle configuration must comply with international standards to mitigate corona losses and radio interference.

1.6 Environmental Suitability

Environmental factors such as corrosion resistance in coastal or desert areas are critical:

• Copper conductors offer excellent corrosion resistance but are too costly for modern transmission lines.
• Aluminum conductors (ACSR, AAAC, ACAR) provide a good balance of cost, weight, and corrosion resistance.
• Bimetallic corrosion is a challenge in ACSR (aluminum conductor steel reinforced), where galvanic action between aluminum and steel can cause bulging. Modern designs use Alumo-weld (AW) cores or grease-filled cores to mitigate this.

1.7 Corrosion Resistance – Research Findings

• Pure aluminum shows the best corrosion resistance under most environments.
• Smooth body conductors perform better than stranded conductors with rough surfaces.
• Larger diameter strands are preferable over smaller strands for the same cross-sectional area.

For aggressive environments, the following order of preference is recommended:

1. Fully greased aluminum conductor
2. Aluminum conductor with Alumo-weld core (fully greased)
3. ACSR fully greased
4. Aluminum alloy conductors (fully greased)
5. Aluminum conductor with Alumo-weld core (ungreased)
6. ACSR with greased core

---

2. Thermal Ampacity Consideration

Conductor ampacity refers to the maximum current a conductor can carry continuously without exceeding temperature limits. This is influenced by the heat balance between I²R losses, solar gain, and heat dissipation.

2.1 Heat Balance Equation

The conductor’s current rating is calculated from the balance:

Heat Generated = Heat Lost by Convection + Heat Lost by Radiation – Heat Gained by Solar Radiation

This balance depends on:

• Ambient temperature
• Solar absorption coefficient (αs)
• Wind velocity (natural cooling effect)
• Emissivity of conductor surface (EC)

In design, simplified formulas or IEEE Std. 738 methods are often applied.

2.2 Operating Temperature Limits

Transmission lines must remain within maximum allowable conductor temperatures to prevent excessive sag and mechanical degradation. The SEC (Saudi Electricity Company) standards specify:

• ACSR “Condor”: 80°C (normal), 90°C (emergency)
• AAAC (1000 kcmil): 80°C (normal), 90°C (emergency)
• ACAR (1080 kcmil): 85°C (normal), 95°C (emergency)
• ACSR “Hawk/Grosbeak”: 93°C (normal), 125°C (emergency)
• ACSR/AW “Drake” and similar: 93°C (normal), 125°C (emergency)

Emergency operation (above normal limits) is typically restricted to 10 hours/year to protect conductor integrity.

---

3. Bundled Conductors

Bundling refers to using two or more sub-conductors per phase, separated by spacers. This configuration is widely used in extra high voltage (EHV) lines (230 kV and above).

3.1 Advantages of Bundling

1. Reduced Inductive Reactance – improving power transfer efficiency.
2. Reduced Voltage Gradient – lowering corona discharge levels.
3. Increased Corona Extinction Voltage – reducing radio interference and corona power loss.
4. Higher Power Transfer per Unit Mass – more efficient than a single large conductor.

3.2 Practical Adoption

• SEC standardizes 2-bundled conductors per phase up to 230 kV lines.
• For 380 kV lines, 4-bundle configurations are adopted.

Bundling also reduces audible noise and electrostatic effects near populated areas.

---

4. Corona and Conductor Surface Gradient

At high voltages, the electric field near the conductor surface may exceed the breakdown strength of air (~31 kV/cm peak, or 22 kV/cm RMS), causing corona discharge.

4.1 Effects of Corona

• Energy losses due to ionization
• Audible noise (buzzing sound near lines)
• Radio and TV interference
• Surface degradation of conductors

4.2 Surface Gradient Calculation

The voltage gradient at the conductor surface can be estimated using Gauss’s law:

Vg = Q / (2 × π × ε0 × r)

Where:

• Vg = surface gradient (volts per meter)
• Q = surface charge per unit length (coulomb/m)
• r = conductor radius (cm)
• ε0 = permittivity of free space (8.85 × 10⁻¹² F/m)

In practical form for transmission lines, it can be expressed as:

Vg = Up / [ r × log(D / r) ]

Where:

• Vg = surface gradient (kV/cm)
• Up = phase-to-ground voltage (kV)
• r = conductor radius (cm)
• D = spacing between phases (cm) or equivalent spacing for three-phase lines

For three-phase systems:
D = (D12 × D23 × D31)^(1/3)

4.3 Design Implications

• To reduce corona, larger conductor diameters or bundled conductors are used.
• Corona performance often becomes the limiting factor in 380 kV and above lines, rather than thermal ampacity.
• Engineers must balance practical size, mechanical handling, and corona limits.

---

Conclusion

Conductor selection is a multi-disciplinary decision that integrates electrical, mechanical, thermal, and environmental factors. While thermal ampacity ensures safe current transfer, bundled conductors enhance efficiency at higher voltages, and corona considerations safeguard performance and communication reliability. Corrosion resistance and environmental adaptation remain equally vital, especially in desert, coastal, and industrial zones.

By carefully evaluating these considerations, utilities can design overhead transmission lines that achieve cost-effectiveness, reliability, and long-term system stability.

For engineers and planners, understanding conductor behavior is not just about selecting a wire—it is about ensuring that the power grid remains efficient, safe, and future-ready.

---

---